Hey people, is anyone keen for an app that measures kitesurf jump heights using a smartwatch - not requireing anything else apart from the watch?
I know a few of the manufacturers have various " altitude " readouts, but these are pretty much useless for the purpose of jump heights.
Nick
My Garmin Epix2 does that with the WooKite app. It vibrates and displays the jump height & duration immediately after each landing. But yeah it needs the woo.
Hey
Garmin watches are great to see the hight of your jumps on,
but you still need a device that measure your jumps like the woo on your board or your phone with the surfr app in your wetsuit or on your board.
I use the woo and the garmin vivioactive 4 and it works great for me!
Yes, there are apps that you can get that will only run on your watch that can show your jump height. Speaking from the Garmin ecosphere, and there are several (paid) apps you can get that show you how high you are jumping.
If you want to interrogate these apps more, you can see the results here (or google garmin kite app): apps.garmin.com/en-US/search?q=kite&device=&deviceLimit=&appType=&sort=&start=0&count=30
It's been over 12 months since I explored native watch apps, this one looks new, might give it a go and see how it performs: www.007software.eu/apps/kite-trackers-page/
The best solutions so far that i have used are easily the Woo + Garmin or the surfr.app which requires you use a phone on your body or board which can connect to your watch to display how high you jump.
How accurate have you found the watch versions, verses the mounted devices?
I see that in most testing the mounted devices don't agree with each other, and even different generations of the same devices, the jumps get higher with each generation, so I am dubious as to how accurate they actually are.
I thought that Xensr did an apple watch software app a few years back that used the sensors within the watch much like surfr uses the sensors in your phone.
Its probably this as the company died a few years back: apps.apple.com/us/app/sessions-surfsports/id1220676251?platform=appleWatch
At the time I remember them claiming it was a similar level of accuracy as the one on the board though they did say you could 'cheat' it by waving your arm around at the top of the jump.
The surfr guys reckon that running the phone inside the drybag in your wetsuit was pretty much as accurate as running it on the board (though you couldn't do the thing where you lift your legs up to get extra height in a jump). They had a setting to make it shout out the height after a jump or to make it vibrate once per metre of height I think so you didn't need to be able to look at it.
I like my garmin app that pairs to a woo best. But you need a woo on your board.
How accurate have you found the watch versions, verses the mounted devices?
I see that in most testing the mounted devices don't agree with each other, and even different generations of the same devices, the jumps get higher with each generation, so I am dubious as to how accurate they actually are.
Last I tried, I found them lacking. May be worth trying again.
How accurate have you found the watch versions, verses the mounted devices?
I see that in most testing the mounted devices don't agree with each other, and even different generations of the same devices, the jumps get higher with each generation, so I am dubious as to how accurate they actually are.
Last I tried, I found them lacking. May be worth trying again.
I've done a load of testing on the raw sensor outputs on the watch like GPS and Barometric altitude, and they are both definately not useable. I'm going to try and write some code, that I think will give some accurate readings.... might have a beta within a few weeks to try.
How accurate have you found the watch versions, verses the mounted devices?
I see that in most testing the mounted devices don't agree with each other, and even different generations of the same devices, the jumps get higher with each generation, so I am dubious as to how accurate they actually are.
I tried the app i mentioned in an above post the other day.
It's not usable on the water. Even off the water it's not that great. Below is the Elevation changes tracked by the app. There were a few jumps, but its hard to figure out when they were and how high they were.
GPS, speed, direction etc all seemed to work fine. But that wasn't really what I was looking for.
Neldy...... I'm on the job.
I had a suspicion a lot of those apps were just using the GPS or baro sensors - both of which are completely unusable.
Baro has so much time lag that by the time you land the sensor is only just starting to record that you jumped.
GPS accuracy is to 10's of meters normally... you can see in your plot the sea level changed from 15 meters, to 10 then up to 30 meters,
That is typical of the standard watch GPS and Baro sensor combination, and the GPS only updates once a second on top of that.
I've got some testing to do on Friday against a Woo to finalize / confirm that my maths works, but I am pretty confident of a 100 fold improvement over the graphs you are looking at. My app won't record your elevation, it will only record the detected jump metrics, which should give jump height on your watch a couple seconds after you land amongst other things.... or it could store you highest jump, or give other data as users request.
All going well I may be able to pump out a beta app in a week or two.
Only drawback if you have an older watch, is that it must have an inbuilt accelerometer.
Neldy...... I'm on the job.
I had a suspicion a lot of those apps were just using the GPS or baro sensors - both of which are completely unusable.
Baro has so much time lag that by the time you land the sensor is only just starting to record that you jumped.
GPS accuracy is to 10's of meters normally... you can see in your plot the sea level changed from 15 meters, to 10 then up to 30 meters,
That is typical of the standard watch GPS and Baro sensor combination, and the GPS only updates once a second on top of that.
I've got some testing to do on Friday against a Woo to finalize / confirm that my maths works, but I am pretty confident of a 100 fold improvement over the graphs you are looking at. My app won't record your elevation, it will only record the detected jump metrics, which should give jump height on your watch a couple seconds after you land amongst other things.... or it could store you highest jump, or give other data as users request.
All going well I may be able to pump out a beta app in a week or two.
Only drawback if you have an older watch, is that it must have an inbuilt accelerometer.
Very cool! If you would like a tester, i'd be happy to help provide feedback.
May the best algorithm win.
Any thoughts on the garmin instinct 2 kitesurf setting apparently it logs jump height
www.garmin.com/en-AU/p/775644/pn/010-02626-12
Any thoughts on the garmin instinct 2 kitesurf setting apparently it logs jump height
Read a few posts back - cannot be done by watches alone.
Them f######g weird cats scare the shidt out of me
Why would you own something that f#####g scary
I'd jump 15 trrs without a kite if one of them F####s came near me
Cats???
These are peruvian armadillos i got them at a market in pachecho near puna
Theyre just malting the new shells should be coming back in any day now.
Any thoughts on the garmin instinct 2 kitesurf setting apparently it logs jump height
Read a few posts back - cannot be done by watches alone.
Hold my beer...... The change is coming
It can and will be done on at least Garmin watches.... I'm mostly through proving it, another 20 jumps to record this weekend.
I Recommend for kitesurfing or sailing, get the biggest display, and touch screen will need to be disabled because water on the screen will cause random button pushes, so then I also recommend get something with 5 buttons because touch screen will be disabled.
Lastly, get something with over or around 1,000,000 Application memory as a must, otherwise you will only be able to run some applications
In general if the watch supports maps, or MP3's, then it probably has over 1,000,000 of application memory.
Link below, click on your watch,
Look at Watch App
Number should be close to or over 1 million and be ok.
131,000 or less and you will be limited to very basic stuff.... probably not jump height.
developer.garmin.com/connect-iq/reference-guides/devices-reference/#devicereference
Barometric sensors are inaccurate, and have time lag because of how they work. They are not instant. You will get an instant inaccurate reading for the first 4 to 7 seconds after changing altitude. Ie - no good for kitesurf jump height.
The best watches in my opinion are the Fenix 51mm, with Solar charging. Fenix 6 or 7, although 7 has nice upgrades.
Instant altitude, it says in there that they are using a standard barometer ( with lag ) and applying maths to it..... You can probably guess what I have done with the Garmin watch sensors.
So far I'm pretty confident I can code at least flat water jumps....... monster ocean swells may be a problem through, rolls 'should' be ok, and board grabs 'should' also be ok with some fiddling
Dach
Any thoughts on the garmin instinct 2 kitesurf setting apparently it logs jump height
www.garmin.com/en-AU/p/775644/pn/010-02626-12
Instinct 2
Watch App 98 304 ** Bit of a Dud here for complicated applications
Fenix 5
Watch App 131 072 * This has problems running my kite / sailing application
Fenix 6
Watch App 1 310 720 * This can run anything
Damn well... im going to give it a go tomorrow maybe is there a garmin kitesurf group i can join theres alot of running groups with leaderboards gotto be a kite one somewhere
Also if you go to *cough itek orumf cough* the dude who coded the kiteapp i believe is posting a fair bit in there on the end of a thread. His avatars a little old man with grey hair i believe hes the same old man with grey hair that featured in the youtubers (our kite life ) video about the kite watches... so if your also writeing then maybe talk to him
Im ummm well... im gonna try connect my xctracer to the watch ?? should be a fun running log at 10k feet wonder what trophy i get for that one
Its funny btw when i buily my last variometer i had to put some wetsuit material over the sensor otherwise it was too sensitive now im confused... do i wear the watch over or under my wetsuit?
Hold my beer...... The change is coming
It can and will be done on at least Garmin watches.... I'm mostly through proving it, another 20 jumps to record this weekend.
I have a garmin fenix 6 if you want someone else to help you beta test (if the coming storm delivers this Sunday).
Hold my beer...... The change is coming
It can and will be done on at least Garmin watches.... I'm mostly through proving it, another 20 jumps to record this weekend.
I have a garmin fenix 6 if you want someone else to help you beta test (if the coming storm delivers this Sunday).
This week was just for data gathering so I can run more actual jumps through the code I've created to see what heights come out and how they compare to other industry devices.
I also have a relationship with KANARA, and they do have a leaderboard system in their app. I will probably lobby them to include my jump calcs once they are proven:)
I dare say, when I first put the app in the app store it will be a time limited beta.
Just finished coding the jump recognition, jump start identification, landing identification, Hangtime is finished, and now I'm up to the Jump height - which I needed the extra data to verify a little more.
I'm going to be very happy if I have figured this out. Wear your watch on your wrist and the app does the rest.
:)
Dach
ok i am going to add my two pesos worth as on a kiteboarding trip in progresso Mexico...
i am an engineer kiteboarder and i don't like the woo.
i have been working on a bunch of ideas for a year or so. There is lots of code out there for apogee detection and kalman filters but like the woo you can cheat yourself once you know how the code works.
i agree that even the latest and greatest barometric sensors get all beat up by our kiting environment. The ones in the garmin are hard to get a raw unfiltered reading from.
9 axis sensors are a challenge as well but i am interested in seeing how a wrist mounted device compares to the woo.
The only truly reliable way to get height 10 times a second is rtk gps this is known as surveyor grade. This gives absolute accuracy down to 10cm ,10 times a second. In the usa the correction signal is free but our state govts have decided to make money and not use standard formats uggh. This tech used to be 30k now its $us500. It works amazingly bluetooth to a watch but what kiter is going to
pay 2k for a truly accurate jump height solution when woo massages egos so well.
happy to chat more off line. feelih@gmail.com. I live on the gold coast. Ian
During some of the testing I did a set number of jumps with the WOO and the watch app, 6 jumps in total.
Watch recorded all 6 ( because at that stage I was hitting record prior to the jump ) Woo only recorded 5. These were 3- 4 meter jumps flat water with quite violent pops also.
And as you mentioned, I can see straight away looking at the data how someone can make a WOO read higher.
The fenix 7x solar supposedly uses twin GPS constellations to give a more accurate reading, and this does appear to be the case in 2D, but not 3D height from my observations. Hence I have had to use the other sensor information.
Launch G, Launch speed , Jump Height, Hang time, Landing G, Jump Distance - all doable.
I noticed that usually the woo miss a jump when I take off from a kicker, I'm assuming as the kicker make you go up then it can't differentiate between the kicker and the actual jump.
I noticed that usually the woo miss a jump when I take off from a kicker, I'm assuming as the kicker make you go up then it can't differentiate between the kicker and the actual jump.
I think its worse based on the landings for me. Land too much heelside (crashing basically) and it seems to miss them. Get too gentle a landing and land flat and its the same. I think its another of the well known 'cheats' for extra height along with the deadman dangle - smash your feet down hard on the landing and you get bigger figures
I noticed that usually the woo miss a jump when I take off from a kicker, I'm assuming as the kicker make you go up then it can't differentiate between the kicker and the actual jump.
I think its worse based on the landings for me. Land too much heelside (crashing basically) and it seems to miss them. Get too gentle a landing and land flat and its the same. I think its another of the well known 'cheats' for extra height along with the deadman dangle - smash your feet down hard on the landing and you get bigger figures
Add a few rotations in there if you want to jump real big :)